Happy New Year everyone! This is my first post here. I’ve already shared this on STM and AffLIFT, so I thought I’d share it here too.
In the last week of 2025, running RSOC search arbitrage via Rocket Maximizer, here’s what the data looked like:
By the way, I’m always trying to achieve a 20% ROI which I believe is achievable with this much ad spend.
What I’ve learned over the past few months is that the players who stayed in the game learned how to stay patient and keep testing instead of quitting, scale down and test on lower budgets, take advantage of AI and automation, and most importantly treat search arbitrage like a real business.
also thanks to platforms like Rocket Maximizer which have changed the game by offering faster approvals, easier setup, quicker campaign launches, the ability to rotate multiple feeds in the background, and automated keyword optimization.
I’m happy to share the strategy I’m using to find and scale campaigns so here it is.
How I Find Winning Verticals
My Exact Scaling Rules
Search arbitrage isn’t the same as it used to. But it is still working for those who are patient and keep testing.
Google cracking down on shady players, only clean, patient, and compliant players will thrive.
In the last week of 2025, running RSOC search arbitrage via Rocket Maximizer, here’s what the data looked like:
- $113,333 ad spend
- $130,073 revenue
- $16,740 net profit
- 15% ROI
By the way, I’m always trying to achieve a 20% ROI which I believe is achievable with this much ad spend.
What I’ve learned over the past few months is that the players who stayed in the game learned how to stay patient and keep testing instead of quitting, scale down and test on lower budgets, take advantage of AI and automation, and most importantly treat search arbitrage like a real business.
also thanks to platforms like Rocket Maximizer which have changed the game by offering faster approvals, easier setup, quicker campaign launches, the ability to rotate multiple feeds in the background, and automated keyword optimization.
I’m happy to share the strategy I’m using to find and scale campaigns so here it is.
How I Find Winning Verticals
- Look at what’s already working.
Spy competitors. Use spy tools. Watch top performing Facebook pages.
If those pages are launching new ads every day then it must be working. - Recreate it but don’t copy blindly.
Use the same angles and structure, then test your own creatives.
Small changes make a big difference. - Test everything.
- Scale what works. Turn off what doesn’t. Winners get more budget. Losers get cut.
- Initial test budgets:
Usually $10-$20/day for up to 3 days
- Early warning signs:
If I see ‑100% ROI within $5-$10 spend, I kill those campaigns.
Often this means:- The ad isn’t appearing properly on the landing page
- The creative isn’t good enough
- Or big mismatch between creative and landing page
- Acceptable initial test performance:
- ‑50% ROI at $10 spend
- -30% ROI at $20 spend
- ‑20% ROI at $30 spend
- Break‑even or better at $50
- >5% ROI at $100
My Exact Scaling Rules
- Scaling rules:
- 20-30% budget increases only
- Every 2-3 days
- Only if the campaign is holding 30%+ ROI
- Duplicate campaign and test different creatives (video/static images)
My FB Campaign Setup
I keep structure simple to avoid fragmenting data:- Creatives:
- 3-5 creatives mix of both video and static images
- 4-5 body copy
- 1 headline
- Bidding strategy:
- Default: highest volume
- Cost caps only when burst spend or instability appears
- Budgets:
- $5-$10/day
- I don’t launch/test any campaign with large budgets unless I am duplicating a winner.
- Faster data
- Faster decisions to cut or scale
Search arbitrage isn’t the same as it used to. But it is still working for those who are patient and keep testing.
Google cracking down on shady players, only clean, patient, and compliant players will thrive.
