Graybeard
Well-Known Member
this is my traffic data
***Worthy to note here; this is redirected image click email sourced traffic and not clicked email text link traffic
Anthropic Claude Opus 3 `got it` better than ChatGPT4
This cuts to the chase. This process was completed in 2 minutes at most of AI time.
Most of my time cost was human formatting this board post
2 AI bots that cost me $40 month replace so much of my time it's ridiculous.
However it is worthy to say that my drilling down and analysis of the details and the particulars and attributes is a discovery process that I have not yet been able to prompt AI to do.
***the conversion rate was wrong I had to remove it from this table in an edit.
***Worthy to note here; this is redirected image click email sourced traffic and not clicked email text link traffic
Anthropic Claude Opus 3 `got it` better than ChatGPT4
This cuts to the chase. This process was completed in 2 minutes at most of AI time.
Most of my time cost was human formatting this board post
2 AI bots that cost me $40 month replace so much of my time it's ridiculous.
However it is worthy to say that my drilling down and analysis of the details and the particulars and attributes is a discovery process that I have not yet been able to prompt AI to do.
***the conversion rate was wrong I had to remove it from this table in an edit.
Metric | Email Traffic | Popunder Traffic | Normalized Email Traffic (per $50) | Normalized Popunder Traffic (per $224) | Comments |
Cost | $50 | $224 | $50 | $224 | The cost of email traffic is $50, while the cost of popunder traffic is $224. |
Average engagement time | 1m 08s | 6s | 1m 08s | 1.34s | After normalization, email traffic still shows significantly higher engagement time compared to popunder traffic. |
Engaged sessions | 118 | 3783 | 118 | 843.08 | Normalized engaged sessions are much higher for popunder traffic due to the higher cost, but email traffic remains more engaged relative to its cost. |
Events per session | 6.38 | 0.18 | 6.38 | 0.04 | Normalized events per session remain significantly higher for email traffic, indicating better engagement and interaction relative to the cost. |
Conversions | 1052 | 3 | 1052 | 0.67 | Normalized conversions are substantially higher for email traffic, suggesting it is more cost-effective for driving conversions. |
Avg events per session | 1 | 1.05 | 1 | 0.23 | Normalized average events per session are higher for email traffic, suggesting more meaningful engagement relative to the cost. |
Avg sessions per user | 1.29 | 1 | 1.29 | 0.22 | Normalized average sessions per user remain higher for email traffic, indicating better visitor retention and loyalty relative to the cost. |
% of new sessions | 89.83% | 99.97% | 89.83% | 22.31% | The normalized percentage of new sessions is higher for email traffic, suggesting it attracts more new visitors relative to the cost compared to popunder traffic. |
Last edited:
