The Most Active and Friendliest
Affiliate Marketing Community Online!

“AdsEmpire”/  Direct Affiliate

Where's the real money in Texas $$$

Graybeard

Well-Known Member
Well it's not in Dallas :p

top-texas-zips-123456.png


data source: US IRS `individual personal` Tax Returns 2016 *based on public data :p
Multiplier is my own algorithm. USA median is about 220 :: Rank or 1.000

Where da F*K is Fullshear?

What you don't know can't help you!
 
Last edited:
I am one of the Puppet Masters -- I make the robots dance
29215_390742406228_126296966228_4151588_1574985_n.jpg


mysql> select AVG(borrowerInc), AVG(AreaMedianHsldInc),
AVG(AgeB1) from fha_loans_2017 WHERE postal2d='6'
and MSA ='40900' AND county_code = '113' ;
+------------------+------------------------+------------+
| AVG(borrowerInc) | AVG(AreaMedianHsldInc) | AVG(AgeB1) |
+------------------+------------------------+------------+
| 124942.5527 | 75200.0000 | 47.7468 |
+------------------+------------------------+------------+
1 row in set (1.00 sec)

mysql> select * from zip_tract_crosswalk WHERE tract REGEXP '10310$'; +--------+-------+-------------+
| id | zip | tract |
+--------+-------+-------------+
| 4246 | 23666 | 51650010310 |
| 46303 | 46254 | 18097310310 |
| 58806 | 87035 | 35049010310 |
| 75379 | 95691 | 06113010310 |
| 102903 | 87047 | 35049010310 |
| 120218 | 87056 | 35049010310 |
| 145511 | 87015 | 35049010310 |
+--------+-------+-------------+
7 rows in set (0.09 sec)

mysql> select * from zip_tract_crosswalk WHERE zip REGEXP '95691';
+--------+-------+-------------+
| id | zip | tract |
+--------+-------+-------------+
| 11210 | 95691 | 06113010402 |
| 32745 | 95691 | 06113010201 |
| 32747 | 95691 | 06113010204 |
| 37769 | 95691 | 06113010102 |
| 75379 | 95691 | 06113010310 |
| 96790 | 95691 | 06113010302 |
| 118221 | 95691 | 06113010312 |
| 139894 | 95691 | 06113010203 |
+--------+-------+-------------+
8 rows in set (0.09 sec)

Google Maps
 
the chart is just a test mock-up -- the JavaScript injection of the watermarked background was the purpose of that test.

my database is getting big
| DATABASE_NAME | SUM(TABLE_ROWS) |
+----------------------+-----------------------+
| entries | 17,791,908 |
+----------------------+-----------------------+
| medical | 20,037,242 |
+----------------------+-----------------------+



In the end there will be small specific databases related to categories and chart data will be injected into the HTML from JSON code
 
Last edited:
this is the complex stuff; and it really isn't once composed as a query :p
***need to SET the variable FIRST
oops
mysql> SET @INCaffinity:=(SELECT
-> affinity
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0201M' AND year=2017);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.33 sec)
mysql> SELECT
-> "All USA Consumers" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0201M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "Less than $15,000" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0218M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$15,000 to $29,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0219M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$30,000 to $39,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0207M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$40,000 to $49,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0208M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$50,000 to $69,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0209M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$70,000 to $99,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0220M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$100,000 to $149,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0221M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$150,000 to $199,999" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0222M' AND year=2017
-> UNION ALL
-> SELECT
-> "$200,000 and more" AS "Cellular phone by Income Range:",
-> year,
-> (affinity/@INCaffinity) AS "Affinity Index"
-> FROM change_pct_cx WHERE series_id = 'CXU270102LB0223M' AND year=2017
-> ORDER BY `Affinity Index`DESC
-> ;
+---------------------------------+------+----------------+
| Cellular phone by Income Range: | year | Affinity Index |
+---------------------------------+------+----------------+
| $200,000 and more | 2017 | 1.7182 |
| $150,000 to $199,999 | 2017 | 1.6055 |
| $100,000 to $149,999 | 2017 | 1.4410 |
| $70,000 to $99,999 | 2017 | 1.2460 |
| $50,000 to $69,999 | 2017 | 1.0599 |
| All USA Consumers | 2017 | 1.0000 |
| $40,000 to $49,999 | 2017 | 0.8980 |
| $30,000 to $39,999 | 2017 | 0.8426 |
| $15,000 to $29,999 | 2017 | 0.5760 |
| Less than $15,000 | 2017 | 0.4195 |
+---------------------------------+------+----------------+
10 rows in set (1.47 sec)
this indicates people that pay for service and probably pay for most mobile phone userd. This is NOT mobile phone USAGE by income group.
 
Last edited:
MI
Back