Should the Google algorithms be regulated? The New York Times thinks so

[djbaxter]

The Google Algorithm
Editorial, New York Times
July 14, 2010

Google handles nearly two-thirds of Internet search queries worldwide. Analysts reckon that most Web sites rely on the search engine for half of their traffic. When Google engineers tweak its supersecret algorithm ? as they do hundreds of times a year ? they can break the business of a Web site that is pushed down the rankings.

When Google was a pure search engine, it was easy to appear agnostic about search results, with no reason to play favorites with one Web site or another. But as Google has branched out into online services from maps and videos to comparison shopping, it has acquired pecuniary incentives to favor its own over rivals.

Google argues that its behavior is kept in check by competitors like Yahoo or Bing. But Google has become the default search engine for many Internet users. Competitors are a click away, but a case is building for some sort of oversight of the gatekeeper of the Internet.

Read more...

 

[affiliateGroundz]

I definitely think that Google should be regulated. They've started to obtain a monopoly if you ask me haha. But those are just my thoughts

 

[djbaxter]

I kind of agree, too.

See Danny Sullivan's satirical rejoinder at The New York Times Algorithm & Why It Needs Government Regulation.<!-- google_ad_section_end -->