Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If you are looking to capitalize on targeted SEO in one or 2 search terms, without building a gazillion links, then make your home page static. You see a static page isnt ever changing and can sustain results a bit easier. Plus if your using say wordpress your dynamic data isnt as easy to crawl as the static version.
Fiction: Sites are not included in Google's index if they use ASP (or some other non-html file-type.)
Fact: We're able to index most types of pages and files with very few exceptions. A sampling of the file extensions we're able to index includes: pdf, asp, jsp, html, shtml, xml, doc, xls, ppt, rtf, wks, lwp, wri, swf, cfm, and php.
As the web continues to change and evolve, our algorithms change right along with it. Recently, as a result of one of those algorithmic changes, we've modified our webmaster guidelines. Previously, these stated:
However, we've recently removed that technical guideline, and now index URLs that contain that parameter. So if your site uses a dynamic structure that generates it, don't worry about rewriting it -- we'll accept it just fine as is. Keep in mind, however, that dynamic URLs with a large number of parameters may be problematic for search engine crawlers in general, so rewriting dynamic URLs into user-friendly versions is always a good practice when that option is available to you. If you can, keeping the number of URL parameters to one or two may make it more likely that search engines will crawl your dynamic urls.Don't use "&id=" as a parameter in your URLs, as we don't include these pages in our index.
static pages are easier for search engines to crawl and rank properly.
'Fraid not. Dynamic pages are just as easy to crawl and rank as static pages. Most websites today are dynamic because they're simply easier to maintain. The search engines have figured out how to crawl and rank them just fine for many, many years now. It's true that there are specific things you need to watch out for when creating a dynamic site, but most developers are aware of the worst of the issues. You certainly should consult with an SEO if you're changing content management systems, or if you're having problems getting your dynamic URLs spidered and indexed. But there's no reason to have only static pages on your site because you're worried about the search engines being able to index dynamic pages.
Which can Googlebot read better, static or dynamic URLs?
We've come across many webmasters who, like our friend, believed that static or static-looking URLs were an advantage for indexing and ranking their sites. This is based on the presumption that search engines have issues with crawling and analyzing URLs that include session IDs or source trackers. However, as a matter of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas. While static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates because users can easily read the urls, the decision to use</SPAN> database-driven websites does not imply a significant disadvantage in terms of indexing and ranking. Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.
I mean what are we talking about here. You offer no resolve to the poster. How can you get ranked in SERP's for sure using a dynamic site? What you are saying is that it is by chance? Can you offer instructions on how to get ranked in SERps with a dynamic site on the index page in 2 weeks or whatever fast is to you.
But the ultimate point that makes you wrong is page load speed. The page poad speed of a WP framework will never compare to a static site. Side by side this factor will get the results for the static page over the dynamic.
Sorry it wasn't phrased very well. Its just i have a "Home" button and a "Blog" button, when clicked they are exactly the same as i have the blog on my homepage. It would be exactly the same as clicking on the "Home" and "Blog" buttons on this forum at the top...with both of them being the same.