[Question] Affordable VPS for Prosper202

[r0y]

Hi All,
I am about to setup my own tracking system, planning to have self-hosted prosper202.
Dedicated hosting is quite expensive, so I think I'll go with VPS.
Can anybody recommend which offer affordable/economic (but still reliable) VPS hosting that can be used for prosper202?
I'm looking for one that cost around $25-$40 a month.
Thanks in advance for your suggestion.

 

[Matt]

Hey,

WOW Hosting have VPS starting at about $20.

Cut-rate virtual server web hosting plans

I am not sure how resource intensive Prosper202 is though?

Also another really good hosting company is WebHostingBuzz, they have cheap VPS as well.

 

[howard]

berman hosting, $12

 

[Freddy63]

This article might also help,

Best VPS for Prosper202

You can't find VPS Affordable than that!

Good Luck

 

[chintanshah]

From my experience don't save on a VPS.
Use a good one out there. You can lose a campaign on even a Milli second higher load time

 

[Matt]

What about beyondhosting? Propser202 recommend it, pricing isn't to bad and it comes preinstalled apparently.

 

[whisky]

I recommend you too beyond hosting or liquid web.

 

[Ered Mithrin]

Guys. do you have any numbers that would back up the theory that when Prosper202 on a shared hosting is used, it's costing marketers money (in lost sales/conversions)? Does it mean that Prosper202 should be always installed on a VPS/dedicated server, or is there a threshold (let's say 1000 clicks/day) and when the threshold is met, marketers should switch to VPS/dedicated server in order to maintain a good performance?

I've seen many recommendations that Prosper202 should be used on a VPS/dedicated server, but I haven't seen any number that would clearly explain why.

Appreciate any comment...

// Ok, just read the Freddy63's article. But still - where does the number 100 come from? Any performance testing?